© 2005 American Thoracic Society
Is Combination the Only Issue?We read with a lot of interest the article "Combination Antibiotic Therapy Lowers Mortality among Severely Critically Ill Patients with Pneumococcal Bacteremia" by Baddour and coworkers (1). Mono- or bitherapy in severe pneumonia is critical in our daily clinical practice, and this work provides potential answers. The mortality reduction is impressive with a bitherapy, although the explanation is not clear.First of all, the patients were included if the treatment was started within the 24 h of the pneumonia diagnosis. It has been shown that a treatment during the first 8 h could dramatically improve survival (2). It is not clear from the data of these authors whether there could be a difference between the two groups with an earlier treatment in the bitherapy arm, partly explaining the observed difference. Among the patients treated with combined therapy, 78.7% were mechanically ventilated. We cannot find in the paper a complete record of the bacteriological data and particularly the potential coinfections associated. The possible activity on these pathogens may also influence the results. In the results section, the global mortality rate is 54.6%. The authors report 55.3% with monotherapy and 23.4% with combined therapy. With the same number of patients in each group and based on these two numbers, the overall mortality seems wrong. From there, it seems difficult to agree with the conclusion that an association of antibiotics improves survival in pneumococcal illness. This study is observational and retrospective with many confounding factors. No explanation for the increased survival is provided. The potential consequences on antibiotic use and bacterial ecology could also be dangerous, particularly with the surprising survival with the use of glycopeptides. However, the most important information for clinical practice is that it is probably useless to continue a combined therapy after three days in pneumococcal-related infections.
Centre Hospitalier G. Chatiliez Tourcoing, France FOOTNOTES Conflict of Interest Statement: None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. REFERENCES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||