This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Weil, M. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Weil, M. H.

Erratum: A Comparison of Myocardial Function After Primary Cardiac and Primary Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest

We regret the error in our article (1) in which Figure 4 was a duplicate of Figure 3. The correct Figure 4 shows the effects of asphyxial or dysrhythmic cardiac arrest on post resuscitation -dPdt and left ventricular end diastolic pressure.

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Significantly greater -dP/dt40 and lower LVEDP were observed after resuscitation from asphyxial cardiac arrest (NMB-E) than that from dysrhythmic cardiac arrest (VF). Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of animals. Open triangles: VF; open squares: NMB-E. *p < 0.005, 1p < 0.01 versus VF.

The Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Palm Springs, California

REFERENCES

1. Kamohara T, Weil MH, Tang W, Sun S, Yamaguchi H, Klouche K, Bisera J. A comparison of myocardial function after primary cardiac and primary asphyxial cardiac arrest. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:1221–1224.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Weil, M. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Weil, M. H.