|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To determine the influence of changes in gastric juice pH due to intravenous administration of pentagastrin and omeprazole on intramucosal regional PCO2 (PrCO2), we investigated 17 healthy human volunteers. Gastric juice pH was obtained from a glass pH electrode for continuous gastric juice pH measurement and PrCO2 was measured by using automated air tonometry. After baseline (8:00 A.M.-9:00 A.M.) the subjects received 0.6 µg/kg/h pentagastrin intravenously for 1 h (9:00 A.M.-10:00 A.M., after stimulation 10:00 A.M.-11:00 A.M.) and 40 mg omeprazole intravenously (after omeprazole 11:00 A.M.-3:00 P.M.). Following pentagastrin administration gastric juice pH significantly decreased from 1.2 ± 0.4 to 0.6 ± 0.4 (mean ± SD, p < 0.007, versus baseline), whereas omeprazole transiently increased luminal pH up to 4.4 ± 1.7 (p < 0.007 versus baseline). These subsequent changes in gastric juice pH were accompanied by a significant increase in PrCO2 from 48 ± 12 to 61 ± 17 mm Hg (p < 0.007 versus baseline) and a decrease to 44 ± 5 mm Hg (p < 0.002 versus pentagastrin), respectively. A gastric juice pH > 4 considerably reduces mean gastric PrCO2 and interindividual variability. Thus omeprazole may improve the validity of gastric tonometry data.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gastric tonometry measuring regional PCO2 (PrCO2) of the gastric lumen has been considered to be a safe and noninvasive, organ-specific, metabolically oriented monitor of the adequacy of gut perfusion, oxygenation, and cellular energy balance (1, 2). Nevertheless, tonometry has yet not been widely accepted in clinical practice. This may relate to potential methodological pitfalls, serious doubts on the validity of intramucosal pH calculation, and finally substantial measurement errors, in particular with saline tonometry (2).
A semicontinuous automated air tonometry technique eliminates many of the technical problems inherent in the manual procedure, including the protracted equilibration time (2). Buffering of gastric acid by bicarbonate secreted by the stomach or entering from the duodenum or esophagus may extensively elevate PrCO2 (3, 4), thus still representing a most important source of error even with automated air tonometry. Consequently, the role of gastric juice pH and the value of histamine-2 (H2)-receptor antagonists for reliable gastric tonometry is still a point of debate (5, 6). It has yet not been considered whether proton pump inhibitors might improve the validity of gastric tonometry determination.
Therefore we investigated the influence of changes in gastric juice pH due to pentagastrin and omeprazole administration on PrCO2 in healthy human volunteers, as determined by semicontinuous automated air tonometry.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Protocol
The institutional review board for human studies at the University Ulm approved the study protocol, and written informed consent was obtained from 17 healthy volunteers (male n = 11, female n = 6) after completing a medical history and a physical examination.
After an overnight fasting period of at least 10 h the volunteers received maintenance fluid infusion with 1 ml/kg/h lactated Ringers solution (Delta-Pharma, Pfullingen, Germany). All monitoring devices were placed under local anesthesia at least 30 min before baseline measurements, which were obtained between 8:00 A.M. and 9:00 A.M. Every 30 min we registered mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), arterial blood gases, and gastric juice pH and gastric PrCO2. To amplify gastric acid secretion we continuously administered 0.6 µg/ kg/h pentagastrin (Peptavlon; Cambridge Laboratory, New Castle, UK) intravenously for 1 h (9:00 A.M. to 10:00 A.M.). Gastric secretion usually begins within 10 min, peaks after 20-30 min, and lasts up to 1 h (7). After cessation of pentagastrin infusion another observation hour without pharmacological intervention followed (10:00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M.). To subsequentlly inhibit gastric acid secretion we employed a proton pump blockade with omeprazole. At 11:00 A.M. the volunteers received 40 mg omeprazole (Antra pro infusione, Astra Zeneca, Bad Homburg, Germany), which was administered as a short infusion over 30 min. The observation period finished at 3:00 P.M.
Gastric pH Measurement and Tonometry
Gastric juice pH was measured continuously using a combined glass electrode with an integral Ag/AgCl reference electrode near the tip (LOT 440; Medical Instruments Corporation, Solothum, Switzerland). The electrode was connected to a receiver (Gastrograph Mark II; Fresenius, Bad Homburg, Germany) for continuous long-term pH-metry. The glass electrode was introduced through the nose and advanced under direct pH measurement until the tip was 10 cm below the gastroesophageal junction, identified by an abrupt pH decrease as the probe entered the stomach.
A nasogastric tonometer tube (Trip NSG; Tonometrics, Helsinki, Finland) equipped with a semipermeable silastic balloon was also placed nasogastrically at the same distance from the nose as the pH electrode. Injecting air and auscultating a gurgling sound over the stomach as well confirmed the satisfactory placement of the tonometer. Subsequently the gastric tonometer was connected to an automated gas analyzer (Tonocap TC-200; Datex, Helsinki, Finland).
Hemodynamics and Arterial Blood Gas Analysis
The hemodynamic monitoring was carried out with an electrocardiographic system (Sirecust 404-1; Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) and a 20-G arterial line, which was inserted into the radial artery under local anesthesia. MAP was measured with disposable transducers (MX 8024-AS; Medex Medical, St. Crispin, UK). Moreover, arterial blood gas values for PO2, PCO2, base excess, bicarbonate, and pH were determined by using an automated analyzer (Stat 5; Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA).
Statistics
The data were analyzed using a personal computer and commercially
available software (Sat View 5.0; Abacus concept Inc., Berkeley, CA).
Data are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD). We tested one
principal null hypotheses: There are no differences in gastric juice pH,
PrCO2, and all other measured variables over the time. For all data
conflicting with normal distribution we employed log (x) transformation before statistical analysis. Differences over the time were examined with a paired Student's t test with Bonferroni correction (
' < 0.0071,
'' < 0.0045), respectively. Significant differences were assumed with an
error of < 0.05.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All studied volunteers had stable hemodynamics (MAP, HR), and arterial blood gases (pHa, PaO2, PaCO2, and bicarbonate) throughout the whole observation period between 8:00 A.M. and 3:00 P.M.
Gastric Juice pH
With mean gastric juice pH values of 1.2 ± 0.4 the volunteers demonstrated a normal acid secretion behavior during baseline measurements. The pentagastrin stimulation of acid secretion resulted in an immediate decrease of gastric juice pH to a mean peak value of 0.6 ± 0.3 at 10:00 A.M., which returned to baseline values 1 h after cessation of the pentagastrin infusion. Omeprazole administration subsequently produced a marked increase in gastric juice pH to a mean peak value of 4.4 ± 1.7. Toward the end of the observation period the gastric juice pH again decreased to almost baseline values (Figure 1).
|
Regional PCO2
The regional to arterial gradient of PCO2 (Pr-aCO2) (Figure 1) and the gastric lumen PrCO2 demonstrated corresponding changes during the whole observation period. Already under baseline conditions we observed a great interindividual variability of PrCO2 with values ranging from 33 to 74 mm Hg in the healthy human volunteers. This variability of PrCO2 even significantly increased after pentagastrin administration. We found mean peak values 61 ± 17 mm Hg 1 h after cessation of the pentagastrin infusion. Following omeprazole administration we confirmed a substantial decrease in PrCO2. Two hours after omeprazole we detected the lowest PrCO2 (44 ± 5 mm Hg) along with a marked reduction of individual deviation. Toward the end of the observation period the PrCO2 tended to increase again.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To the best of our knowledge this is the first study showing the subsequent effects of pentagastrin and omeprazole administration on gastric PrCO2 measurements in healthy human volunteers. The principal findings are as follows:
1. Changes in gastric juice pH are in fact a potential source of error.
2. Omeprazole significantly decreases gastric PrCO2 along with a marked reduction of the interindividual variability in healthy volunteers.
In young healthy humans the PCO2 of the gastric mucosa
should more or less equal blood PCO2 (4), but we already measured a considerable interindividual variability of tonometer
to blood PCO2 gradients from
8 to +31 mm Hg under baseline conditions. Normal Pr-aCO2 values amount to about 9 mm
Hg (8, 9). In contrast to theoretical considerations (1), three
volunteers demonstrated a constant negative Pr-aCO2 gradient, which most likely represents a measurement artifact due
to swallowing environmental air (2). Stimulating acid secretion with pentagastrin resulted in a significant increase in gastric PrCO2, which occurred despite a well-known dose-dependent rise in gastric mucosal blood flow following pentagastrin
administration (10). Augmentation of regional blood flow
normally decreases rather than increases PrCO2 (1). Therefore
both the high PrCO2 values at baseline and the significant increase following pentagastrin most likely indicate generation
of intraluminal PCO2. This is probably due to buffering of normal or stimulated acid load by salivary, duodenal, or gastric bicarbonate, independently from mucosal blood flow and
transmucosal CO2 diffusion (3, 4, 11). In addition, the diffusion of CO2 down its concentration gradient from luminal
fluid into tissue is rather slow, thus allowing generation of a
relatively large PCO2 gradient across the mucosa. (11). Finally,
buffering of gastric acid by bicarbonate in the first part of the
duodenum, followed by reflux of carbon dioxide through the
pylorus, must as well be considered (4), as PCO2 values of up to
500 mm Hg in the duodenal bulb have been recorded in humans (12).
Intraluminal CO2 generation is further supported by the fact that the transient blockade of acid secretion following omeprazole produced a significant decrease of PrCO2 along with a marked reduction of the individual deviation. While abolishing acid and inhibiting bicarbonate secretion, the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole maintains basal gastric mucosal blood flow (10), in contrast to H2 blockers that decrease both acid secretion as well as mucosal perfusion (13). The antisecretory effect of omeprazole was merely transient (2-3 h) in our study. In fact recent data support the finding that inhibition of acid secretion by a continuous infusion is superior to single injections of omeprazole and as well seemingly more effective as a continuous infusion of ranitidine (14). Our data confirm previous findings with ranitidine in healthy humans (3, 4, 8) and in perioperative patients (15) that demonstrated that inhibition of gastric acid secretion prevented the formation of CO2 from bicarbonate and hydrogen ions thereby improving accuracy and precision of the measurement of gastric PrCO2. The present study extends former results by analyzing the effects of both pentagastrin stimulation and subsequent proton pump inhibition as well as by using semicontinuous automated air tonometry for gastric PrCO2 determination.
It can be questioned whether the data presented in healthy
subjects apply to critically ill patients, as ranitidine had no effect on PrCO2 in seriously ill patients (6). This study, however,
has specific limitations, including methodological drawbacks due to the use of semiquantitative gastric luminal pH measurement (16) and saline tonometry (1, 2). Moreover, baseline
gastric pH in the former study appears to be rather high
3.9
in the ranitidine group and 3.7 in the placebo group. Gastric
juice pH is definitely unpredictable in perioperative (15) or in
the critically ill (17), inasmuch as some patients may have an
impaired ability to acidify the gastric lumen, whereas others
do in fact respond to physiological stimuli such as pentagastrin
(5). In patients with severe sepsis, polytrauma, and severe head
injury Wiedeck and coworkers (17) recently demonstrated
gastric pH between 1.8 and 6.2 in untreated patients as compared with 5.5-7.2 in omeprazole (2 × 40 mg/24 h)-treated patients.
Costs of care together with the concept that inhibition of acid secretion predisposes to nosocomial infections is probably the reason that most authors do not use H2 or proton pump blockers before tonometry in critically ill patients (1, 2). An increase in PrCO2 without variation in gastric juice pH (pH > 4-5) likely indicates compromised mucosal perfusion, whereas alterations in PrCO2 along with an acid or changing gastric juice pH could as well indicate buffering of gastric acid by bicarbonate and thus luminal CO2 generation (2). Hence gastric juice pH measurements appear to be mandatory for reliably interpreting gastric tonometry data. The administration of ranitidine or omeprazole, which both certainly do improve the bias and precision of gastric tonometry, may not render gastric pH measurements superfluous (2), because patients may vary in their response and secretion inhibition may only be transient (14).
In conclusion, we demonstrated that changes in gastric acid secretion due to pentagastrin and omeprazole might significantly affect gastric PCO2 tonometry thereby remarkably confounding adequate interpretation. Administration of omeprazole reduces mean gastric PrCO2 and the individual variability in healthy human volunteers.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to to Alexander Brinkmann, M.D., University Clinics Ulm, Department of Anesthesiology, Steinhövelstr. 9, D-89075 Ulm, Germany. E-mail: alexander.brinkmann{at}medizin.uni-ulm.de
(Received in original form April 12, 2000 and in revised form October 4, 2000).
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Brinkmann A, Calzia E, Träger K, Radermacher P. Monitoring the hepato-splanchnic region in the critically ill patient: measurement techniques and clinical relevance. Intensive Care Med 1998; 24: 542-556 [Medline].
2.
Kolkman JJ,
Otte JA,
Groeneveld AB.
Gastrointestinal luminal PCO2
tonometry: an update on physiology, methodology and clinical applications.
Br J Anaesth
2000;
84:
74-86
3. Heard SO, Helsmoortel CM, Kent JC, Shahnarian A, Fink MP. Gastric tonometry in healthy volunteers: effect of ranitidine on calculated intramural pH. Crit Care Med 1991; 19: 271-274 [Medline].
4.
Kolkman JJ,
Groeneveld AB,
Meuwissen SG.
Effect of ranitidine on
basal and bicarbonate enhanced intragastric PCO2: a tonometric study.
Gut
1994;
35:
737-741
5. Higgins D, Mythen MG, Webb AR. Low intramucosal pH is associated with failure to acidify the gastric lumen in response to pentagastrin. Intensive Care Med 1994; 20: 105-108 [Medline].
6. Calvet X, Baigorri F, Duarte M, Saura P, Royo C, Joseph D, Mas A, Artigas A. Effect of ranitidine on gastric intramucosal pH in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 1998; 24: 12-17 [Medline].
7. Brunton LL. Agents for control of gastric acidity and treatment of peptic ulcers. In: Goodman Gilman A, Rall TW, Nies AS, Taylor P, editors. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 8th ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill; 1997, p 897-913.
8. Taylor DE, Gutierrez G, Clark C, Hainley S. Measurement of gastric mucosal carbon dioxide tension by saline and air tonometry. J Crit Care 1997; 12: 208-213 [Medline].
9.
Kolkman JJ,
Steverink PJ,
Groeneveld AB,
Meuwissen SG.
Characteristics of time-dependent PCO2 tonometry in the normal human stomach.
Br J Anaesth
1998;
81:
669-675
10. Pique JM, Leung FW, Tan HW, Livingston E, Scremin OU, Guth PH. Gastric mucosal blood flow response to stimulation and inhibition of gastric acid secretion. Gastroenterology 1988; 95: 642-650 [Medline].
11.
Stevens MH,
Thirlby RC,
Feldman M.
Mechanism for high PCO2 in gastric juice: roles of bicarbonate secretion and CO2 diffusion.
Am J. Physiol
1987;
253:
G527-G530
12. Rune SJ. Acid-base parameters of duodenal contents in man. Gastroenterology 1972; 62: 533-539 [Medline].
13. Mattsson H, Larsson H. Effects of omeprazole on gastric mucosal blood flow in the conscious rat. Scand J Gastroenterol 1987; 22: 491-498 [Medline].
14. Netzer P, Gaia C, Sandoz M, Huluk T, Gut A, Halter F, Husler J, Inauen W. Effect of repeated injection and continuous infusion of omeprazole and ranitidine on intragastric pH over 72 hours. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 351-357 [Medline].
15. Bams JL, Kolkman JJ, Roukens MP, Douma DP, Loef BG, Meuwissen SG, Groeneveld AB. Reliable gastric tonometry after coronary artery surgery: need for acid secretion suppression despite transient failure of acid secretion. Intensive Care Med 1998; 24: 1139-1143 [Medline].
16. Heard SO. Suppression of gastric acid secretion: preventing excess gas. Intensive Care Med 1998; 24: 1123-1125 [Medline].
17. Wiedeck H, Vlatten A, Stanescu A, Georgieff M, Continuous gastric juice pH measurements in critically ill patients at high risk of stress-induced bleeding [abstract]. Intensive Care Med 1998;24(Suppl 1):S47.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. M. Fisher, M. E. Kerr, L. A. Hoffman, R. P. Steiner, and R. A. Baranek A Comparison of Gastric and Rectal CO2 in Cardiac Surgery Patients Biol Res Nurs, April 1, 2005; 6(4): 268 - 280. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. TOBIN Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2001 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2002; 165(5): 565 - 583. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. | Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. |