Effect of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on the Performance of D-dimer Testing, Ventilation/Perfusion Scintigraphy, Spiral Computed Tomographic Angiography, and Conventional Angiography |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD),
differentiating a pulmonary embolism (PE) from an exacerbation of COPD can be difficult, since clinical signs and symptoms of the
two conditions overlap. Development of reliable noninvasive or
minimally invasive techniques for the diagnosis of PE is, especially in these patients, necessary. In this study we assessed the effect of
COPD on the accuracy of the clinical probability estimate (CPE), spiral computed tomographic angiography (SCTA), D-dimer analysis, ventilation perfusion (
/
) scintigraphy, and pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of PE. From May 1997 through March
1998, 627 consecutive patients with suspected PE were investigated in six teaching hospitals. In these patients, D-dimer testing,
CPE,
/
scintigraphy, and SCTA and/or pulmonary angiography
were performed according to a strict diagnostic protocol. The patients were also independently categorized as having COPD or
not. A disagnosis of COPD was established in 91 patients (15%).
The prevalence of PE was similar in patients with and without
COPD (29% and 31%, respectively), notwithstanding the larger
proportion of nondiagnostic
/
scan results in patients with
COPD (46% versus 21%, p < 0.001). The distribution of CPEs, diagnostic value of the D-dimer assay and SCTA, and reproducibility
of pulmonary angiography were comparable among patients with
and without COPD. The presence of COPD does not affect the
diagnostic performance of CPE, D-dimer testing, SCTA, or pulmonary angiography. Furthermore, although more nondiagnostic
/
scan results can be expected in the presence of COPD,
/
scintigraphy remains a valuable screening test in patients with COPD.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ventilation-perfusion (
/
) scintigraphy is the screening
method of choice in patients suspected of having pulmonary
embolism (PE) (1, 2). Although it is safe to withhold therapy
when perfusion scintigraphy is normal, and treatment is usually started when the
/
scan result indicates a high probability of PE (e.g., segmental perfusion defects with preserved ventilation), PE can neither be excluded nor accepted when the
/
scan result is neither normal nor of high probability (3).
In these cases, pulmonary angiography is usually recommended
for reaching a final diagnosis (5, 7). However, this technique is
often not used because of its invasiveness, high cost, potential
risk in patients with acute respiratory failure and cor pulmonale, and limited availability (8, 9). Recently, new, noninvasive
techniques for the diagnostic workup of PE have been proposed, such as D-dimer analysis, spiral computed tomographic
angiography (SCTA), and magnitic resonance angiography, in
order to decrease the number of required pulmonary angiograms.
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
are considered to be at an increased risk for developing PE,
possibly in relation to inactivity, heart failure, and advanced
age (10, 11). Moreover, mortality from PE is thought to be increased in the presence of COPD (12, 13). However, differentiating PE from an exacerbation of COPD resulting from a
respiratory infection, which is an important alternative diagnosis, is difficult, since clinical signs and symptoms of the two
conditions overlap. Unfortunately, the diagnostic value of
/
scintigraphy may be decreased in patients with COPD (10,
14), since structural alterations in their pulmonary vasculature
may have resulted in changes in
/
relationships (14, 15).
Consequently, nondiagnostic
/
scan results will be encountered more often in patients with COPD, resulting in more
frequent indications for pulmonary angiography.
The value of new, noninvasive techniques, including D-dimer analysis and SCTA, for the diagnosis of PE has not yet been differentiated with regard to their performance in the large subgroup of patients with COPD. D-dimer testing is nonspecific, and the D-dimer level may be increased in a variety of diseases, including infections (16, 17).
SCTA, as well as conventional pulmonary angiography, may also perform differently in patients with COPD. This could be due to the anatomic changes in the pulmonary vasculature in COPD, as well as to the possibility that small (subsegmental) emboli may produce (more severe) symptoms, leading to a suspicion of PE, and are more difficult to identify than larger emboli (18).
The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect
of COPD on the clinical probability estimate (CPE), SCTA,
D-dimer analysis, and
/
scintigraphy, as well as on the interobserver variability of pulmonary angiography, for the diagnosis of PE.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects
The data reported in the study are from the Advances in New Technologies Evaluating the Localization of Pulmonary Embolism (ANTELOPE) study (22, 23). All consecutive in- and outpatients with clinically suspected PE and for whom perfusion scintigraphy was requested were considered for study entry. Exclusion criteria were age under 18 yr, pregnancy, and immediate need for thrombolytic therapy. Additionally, patients who had already had objective diagnostic examinations for their symptoms were excluded, as were patients for whom the diagnostic workup for PE could not be started within 24 h. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of all participating centers, and informed consent was obtained from all patients enrolled in the study.
Study Protocol
All patients gave a detailed clinical history and underwent a physical examination. The files of all patients who were thought to have COPD on the basis of anamnestic information were checked to confirm this diagnosis. COPD was considered to exist only when at least one of the following criteria was met: (1) a conclusive abnormal lung function test indicative of COPD; (2) a conclusive statement by a pulmonologist; or (3) a conclusive statement by a treating physician other than a pulmonologist in combination with prescribed COPD-related medication. Neither asthma without the presence of any of the other COPD criteria nor COPD medication alone was considered sufficient for a diagnosis of COPD.
All patients enrolled in the study underwent a diagnostic algorithm, as depicted in Figure 1. A clinical probability estimate scored
on a visual analogue scale, a Tinaquant D-dimer assay,
/
scintigraphy, SCTA, and pulmonary angiography were performed as described
earlier (3, 22) (see online data supplement). The complete study
protocol was performed within 48 h after the perfusion scan, with a
maximum time span of 24 h between the examinations. All examinations were interpreted independently, as described earlier (22, 23). PE
was considered to exist when a pulmonary angiogram was abnormal
or a
/
lung scan gave a high-probability result. A normal perfusion
scan or a normal pulmonary angiogram excluded PE.
|
In addition, we assessed the influence of COPD on the implementation and execution of 81mKr ventilation scintigraphy, SCTA, and pulmonary angiography.
Statistical Analysis
It can be calculated that with approximately 70 patients with COPD and 400 without COPD, differences of 15% to 20% can be identified (type I error = 0.05, two-sided; type II error = 0.2). The comparison of clinical characteristics of patients with and without COPD was done with Student's t test for quantitative data and with Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for qualitative data. The Mann-Whitney test was used for comparing the duration of symptoms in patients with and those without COPD. The difference in interobserver assessment of pulmonary angiography findings in patients with and without COPD was assessed for statistical significance with the method of Kramer and Feinstein (28).
Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of clinical parameters other than COPD on the accuracy of the diagnostic tests used in the study. Two-tailed values of p < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS statistical software (version 8.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects
During the study period, 1,162 consecutive patients suspected
of having PE were considered for study entry at the six ANTELOPE study clinical centers. One hundred and seventy
nine of these patients were excluded for the following reasons: age < 18 yr (n = 16), pregnancy (n = 11), indication for
thrombolytic therapy (n = 5), diagnostic tests already performed (n = 43), and expected inability to complete the study
protocol within 48 h or inability to give informed consent (n = 104). Of the 983 patients eligible for the ANTELOPE study,
627 (64%) gave consent to participate in the study. A diagnosis according to the study protocol could not be obtained for
110 patients (18%) because of withdrawal of consent (n = 10),
medical reasons such as allergy to contrast medium (n = 13),
discrepancy between local and central
/
scan results (n = 44), making of an alternative diagnosis before completion of
the study protocol (n = 21), and technical reasons (n = 22). No important differences in demographic characteristics or
test results were observed in the 517 patients with a final diagnosis and the group of 110 patients in whom no definitive diagnosis was obtained.
Prevalence of COPD and PE
Of the 627 patients who consented to participate in the study, diagnosis of COPD could be confirmed in 91 (15%). Table 1 gives the clinical characteristics of the patients with and without COPD. Patients with COPD were older (p < 0.001), had had symptoms suggestive of PE for a longer period (p = 0.01), and more often had clinical signs of congestive heart failure at study entry (p < 0.01) than did patients without COPD. Patients without COPD had more often undergone recent surgery, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.24). Both the frequency of previous venous thromboembolic disease and inpatient/outpatient status were similar in the groups with and without COPD.
|
PE was confirmed or refuted according to the study protocol (PE status known) in 69 of the 91 patients with COPD (76%), as compared with 448 of the 536 patients (84%) without COPD (p = 0.07). The prevalence of PE was similar in the two groups: 29% of the patients with COPD versus 31% of those without COPD proved to have PE (p = 0.71).
CPE
A CPE, as made by the treating physician before objective
testing, was available for 413 of the 517 patients (80%) with a final diagnosis. The remaining 104 patients (20%) had to be
excluded from the analysis because the estimate was not obtained at all or was not obtained before the
/
lung scan result was known. The CPE categories for patients with and
without COPD are presented in Table 2. The distribution of
the CPE categories was comparable among patients with and
without COPD (p = 0.33). For all CPE categories, the prevalence of PE was comparable in patients with and without COPD (Table 2).
|
Compression Ultrasonography
Compression ultrasonography was performed in 479 patients
whose PE status was known. The sensitivity of compression
ultrasonagraphy for PE was found to be somewhat, although
nonsignificantly, greater in patients with COPD (seven of 20;
35%) than in those without COPD (28 of 133; 21%) (difference = 14%; 95% confidence interval [CI]:
8 to 36%; p = 0.22). A false-positive test result for PE was obtained for one
of the 45 patients (2%) with COPD and for seven of the 281 patients (2%) without COPD. The positive and negative predictive values of ultrasonography were comparable for patients with and without COPD.
/
Scintigraphy
A perfusion scan result was available for 509 of the 517 patients (98%) with a final diagnosis. The frequency of perfusion defects was 75% (50 of 67 patients) among COPD patients and
51% (224 of 442 patients) among patients without COPD (difference = 24%; 95% CI: 13 to 35%; p < 0.001). These defects
were more often segmental or larger in patients with COPD
(46 of 50 defects; 92%) than in patients without COPD (181 of
224 defects; 81%) (difference = 11%; 95% CI: 2 to 20%; p = 0.02). The proportions of patients in whom 81mKr ventilation
scintigraphy could not be performed or was inadequate were
comparable in the groups with and without COPD (2% versus 1%), respectively. As shown in Table 3,
/
scan results in patients with COPD were more frequently nondiagnostic (46%
versus 21%) (difference = 25%; 95% CI: 13 to 38%; p < 0.001)
than in those without COPD, notwithstanding the higher
prevalence of segmental or larger perfusion defects among
these patients. Interestingly, the prevalence of PE was similar
(Table 3) in the two groups when the
/
scan result was nondiagnostic. Overall, the diagnostic performance of a high-probability
/
scan result for PE did not differ significantly
among patients with and those without COPD (Table 4).
|
|
Of the 111 patients (28 with COPD) with a nondiagnostic
/
scan result and a negative result of compression ultrasonography, 16 patients (14%) had PE on pulmonary angiography (three with COPD).
D-Dimer Testing
D-dimer analysis was performed on 313 of the patients with a final diagnosis (61%). The distribution of D-dimer results and prevalence of PE for patients with and without COPD are given in Table 5. Neither the distribution of D-dimer results nor the diagnostic accuracy of the D-dimer assay were influenced by the presence of COPD (Table 4).
|
SCTA
SCTA results were available for 259 of the 282 patients (92%)
who had an abnormal perfusion scan result and a final diagnosis. The proportions of patients on whom SCTA could not be
performed (e.g., known allergy to contrast material) or for
whom an inadequate test result was obtained (for patient-related reasons, such as an open foramen ovale or superior vena
cava syndrome, motion artifacts, or technical failure of the CT
scanner) were similar for patients with and without COPD
(13% versus 10%) (difference = 3%; 95% CI:
7 to 12%; p = 0.58). SCTA was more often performed on patients with
COPD (47 of 69; 68%) than on patients without COPD (212 of 448; 47%) (difference = 21%; 95% CI: 9 to 33%; p < 0.001), owing to the higher prevalence of nondiagnostic
/
scan results in patients with COPD (Table 6). Hence, an
SCTA result that was negative for PE was statistically significantly more often found in patients with than in those without
COPD (77% versus 55%) (difference = 22%; 95% CI: 8 to
36%; p = 0.002). As can be seen in Table 4, the diagnostic performance of SCTA was not influenced by the presence of
COPD.
|
Pulmonary Angiography
Pulmonary angiography was indicated in 66 patients with
COPD and in 205 patients without COPD. Adequate pulmonary angiograms were obtained in similar proportions of patients in the two groups, consisting of 68% (45 patients) with
COPD and 69% (142 patients) without COPD. The interobserver agreement for the two groups was comparable (
= 0.76 and
= 0.78, respectively; p = 0.86).
Additional Observations
For
/
scintigraphy, D-dimer testing, and SCTA, the test
performance characteristics are given in Table 4. Neither congestive heart failure nor age had an influence on SCTA or
D-dimer test performance. However, both age and the presence of congestive heart failure increased the number of nondiagnostic
/
scan results. A multiple regression analysis was
performed with age, congestive heart failure, and COPD as independent variables. After correction for age and congestive
heart failure, the differences in diagnostic performance of
/
scintigraphy in patients with and without COPD persisted.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As expected, our study of a representative group of consecutive in- and outpatients with suspected PE showed that COPD
significantly affects the distribution of
/
scan results. However, in 36 of the 91 patients (39%) with COPD, the
/
scan
result was still conclusive, notwithstanding the more frequent
nondiagnostic
/
scan result for patients with COPD. Moreover, the prevalence of PE both overall and in relation to the
results of
/
scintigraphy was similar in patients with and
without COPD.
The performances of the CPE, D-dimer testing, SCTA, and pulmonary angiography did not differ among patients with and those without COPD. Furthermore, the presence of COPD did not influence the failure to perform any of the diagnostic tests or to obtain adequate test results.
In the present study, 15% of patients with suspected PE were diagnosed as having COPD, which is well within the range found in previous studies (i.e., 14% [12] to 20% [29]). The observed comparability of PE prevalence among patients with and without COPD (29% and 31%, respectively) in our study is in good agreement with the findings of Turkstra and colleagues (39% and 43%, respectively), but differs from the results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolic Disease (PIOPED) study in which a lower prevalence of PE was found in the presence of COPD (22% versus 30%, p = 0.07) (12, 29, 30). In our study, the CPE was based on all available information, inevitably including the patient's COPD status. However, we could not observe a difference in the distribution of the CPEs made by the physician among patients with and without COPD. Furthermore, a disease other than PE, which was considered to be as likely as PE to cause the patient's pulmonary symptoms, was reported with a similar frequency in patients with and without COPD (data not shown).
Our results for the diagnostic value of
/
scintigraphy in
relation to COPD are in agreement with those of two large,
well performed, previously reported studies (29, 31). In these studies, patients with COPD also more often had an abnormal
perfusion scan result, which, in combination with ventilation
scintigraphy, resulted more often in a nondiagnostic
/
scan result.
Although patients with COPD more often had a nondiagnostic
/
scan result, pulmonary angiography revealed that
the prevalence of PE in these patients did not differ from that
in those patients without COPD who had a nondiagnostic
/
scan result. Therefore, the usefulness of the combination of
/
scanning with pulmonary angiography is hardly influenced by the presence of COPD. This again is comparable
with the findings of earlier studies (29, 32).
Limitations of the present study apply to the criteria used
for defining COPD. Since it was our intention to use criteria for the presence of COPD that would be clinically applicable
to patients with suspected PE, the diagnosis of COPD was
based on the clinical information available at the time of enrollment in the study. Although some misclassification of
COPD might have occurred, this did not influence our ability
to observe differences in the distribution of
/
scan results
between patients with and without COPD. Our reliance on
clinical information prohibited us from assessing the influence
of severity of COPD on the performance of the diagnostic
tests. However, in the study by Lesser and colleagues, the distribution of
/
scan results in the 35 patients with moderate
or severe COPD did not differ from the distribution in all 108 patients with COPD (32).
Because we included consecutive patients with suspected
PE, a final diagnosis, as in clinical practice, could not be obtained for all patients. However, we believe that an 18% rate of
failure to obtain a final diagnosis according to our strict protocol is reasonably low and acceptable. Moreover, for ethical reasons, based on previous data, not all diagnostic tests were done
on all patients. Therefore, the applicability of the results of our study is limited in patients with a normal
/
scan.
Although the study was reasonably large, the relatively small number of patients with COPD limited its power to exclude small differences in test characteristics between patients with and without COPD. Fortunately, small differences are likely to be of minimal clinical relevance.
It is unlikely that important biases influenced our results
with respect to the effect of COPD on the performance of diagnostic tests. First, the protocol for our study was executed
equally well in patients with and without COPD. Second, the
proportions of patients for whom an adequate test result was
obtained were similar in the groups of patients with and without COPD. Third, the
/
scans, SCTA scans, and pulmonary
angiograms were assessed by readers who were blinded to the
patients' COPD status and the results of other examinations.
To summarize, we conclude that the presence of COPD
does not influence the performance of the CPE, D-dimer test,
SCTA, or pulmonary angiography. Furthermore, although more
nondiagnostic
/
scan results can be expected in the presence of COPD, which decreases the cost-effectiveness of this
procedure,
/
scintigraphy remains an informative, non-invasive screening test in patients with COPD. Normal and
high-probability
/
scan results are obtained in a substantial
proportion of patients with COPD, and the prevalence of PE
in the presence of a nondiagnostic
/
scan result is comparable for patients with and without COPD. Several diagnostic
algorithms including the CPE,
/
scintigraphy, D-dimer testing, SCTA, and/or pulmonary angiography have been proposed
or evaluated for patients with suspected PE (27, 33). Our observations indicate that these alternative strategies will be
equally applicable to patients with and without COPD, although the cost-effectiveness of
/
scintigraphy may vary.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Ms. I. J. C. Hartmann, M.D., University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiology, Room E 01.132, P.O. Box 85500, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: I.J.C.Hartmann{at}azu.nl
(Received in original form June 6, 2000 and in revised form August 28, 2000).
Participating investigators are listed in the Appendix .Acknowledgments: The authors wish to thank Jeroen Lijmer, of the department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, for his assistance in the statistical analysis.
Supported by grant D094-90 from the Dutch Health Insurance Council.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Hyers TM.
Venous thromboembolism.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1999;
159:
1-14
2. Kelley MA, Carson JL, Palevsky HI, Schwartz JS. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: new facts and strategies. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114: 300-306 .
3. The PIOPED. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA 1990; 263: 2753-2759 [Abstract].
4. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Ginsberg JS, Panju AA, Brill-Edwards P, Coates G, Pineo GF. A noninvasive strategy for the treatment of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 289-297 [Abstract].
5. Hull RD, Hirsh J, Carter CJ, Jay RM, Dodd PE, Ockelford PA, Coates G, Gill GJ, Turpie AG, Doyle DJ, et al . Pulmonary angiography, ventilation lung scanning, and venography for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism with abnormal perfusion lung scan. Ann Intern Med 1983; 98: 891-899 .
6. van Beek EJ, Kuijer PM, Buller HR, Brandjes DP, Bossuyt PM, ten Cate JW. The clinical course of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 2593-2598 [Abstract].
7. Cheely R, McCartney WH, Perry JR, Delany DJ, Bustad L, Wynia VH, Griggs TR. The role of noninvasive tests versus pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 1981; 70: 17-22 [Medline].
8. Cooper TJ, Hayward MWJ, Hartog M. Survey on the use of pulmonary scintigraphy and angiography for suspected pulmonary thromboembolism in the UK. Clin Radiol 1991; 43: 243-245 [Medline].
9.
Khorasani R,
Gudas TF,
Nikpoor N,
Polak JF.
Treatment of patients
with suspected pulmonary embolism and intermediate-probability lung
scans: is diagnostic imaging underused?
AJR
1997;
169:
1355-1357
10.
Lippmann M,
Fein A.
Pulmonary embolism in the patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a diagnostic dilemma.
Chest
1981;
79:
39-42
11.
Stebbings AE,
Lim TK.
A patient with acute exacerbation of COPD who
did not respond to conventional treatment.
Chest
1998;
114:
1759-1761
12.
Carson JL,
Terrin ML,
Duff A,
Kelley MA.
Pulmonary embolism and
mortality in patients with COPD.
Chest
1996;
110:
1212-1219
13. Ryan SF. Pulmonary embolism and thrombosis in chronic obstructive emphysema. Am J Pathol 1963; 43: 767-773 .
14.
Meignan M,
Simonneau G,
Oliveira L,
Harf A,
Cinotti L,
Cavellier JF,
Duroux P,
Ansquer JC,
Galle P.
Computation of ventilation-perfusion
ratio with Kr-81m in pulmonary embolism.
J Nucl Med
1984;
25:
149-155
15. Wagner PD, Dantzker DR, Dueck R, Clausen JL, West JB. Ventilation-perfusion inequality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Invest 1977; 59: 203-216 .
16. Raimondi P, Bongard O, de Moerloose P, Reber G, Waldvogel F, Bounameaux H. D-dimer plasma concentration in various clinical conditions: implication for the use of this test in the diagnostic approach of venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res 1993; 69: 125-130 [Medline].
17. Ginsberg JS, Wells PS, Brill-Edwards P, Donovan D, Panju A, van Beek EJ, Patel A. Application of a novel and rapid whole blood assay for D-dimer in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 1995; 73: 35-38 [Medline].
18.
Remy-Jardin M,
Remy J,
Deschildre F,
Artaud D,
Beregi JP,
Hossein-Foucher C,
Marchandise X,
Duhamel A.
Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and
scintigraphy.
Radiology
1996;
200:
699-706
19.
Teigen CL,
Maus TP,
Sheedy PF,
Stanson AW,
Johnson CM,
Breen JF,
McKusick MA.
Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced
electron-beam CT and comparison with pulmonary angiography.
Radiology
1995;
194:
313-319
20.
Goodman LR,
Curtin JJ,
Mewissen MW,
Foley WD,
Lipchik RJ,
Crain MR,
Sagar KB,
Collier BD.
Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT
versus angiography.
AJR
1995;
164:
1369-1374
21.
Mullins MD,
Becker DM,
Hagspiel KD,
Philbrick JT.
The role of spiral
volumetric computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
Arch Intern Med
2000;
160:
293-298
22.
de Monye W,
van Strijen MJ,
Huisman MV,
Kieft GJ,
Pattynama PM.
for
the Advances in New Technologies Evaluating the Localisation of Pulmonary Embolism (ANTELOPE) Group. Suspected pulmonary embolism: prevalence and anatomic distribution in 487 consecutive patients.
Radiology
2000;
215:
184-188
23. Sanson BJ, Lijmer JG, Mac Gillavry MR, Turkstra F, Prins MH, Buller HR on behalf of the ANTELOPE-Study Group. Comparison of a clinical probability estimate and two clinical models in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2000;83:199-203.
24. Janssen MC, Heebels AE, de Metz M, Verbruggen H, Wollersheim H, Janssen S, Schuurmans MM, Novakova IR. Reliability of five rapid D-dimer assays compared to ELISA in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1997; 77: 262-266 [Medline].
25. Lensing AW, Prandoni P, Brandjes D, Huisman PM, Vigo M, Tomasella G, Krekt J, Wouter TC, Huisman MV, Buller HR. Detection of deep-vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 342-345 [Abstract].
26.
Remy-Jardin M,
Remy J,
Wattinne L,
Giraud F.
Central pulmonary
thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique
comparison with pulmonary angiography.
Radiology
1992;
185:
381-387
27. Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron MJ, de Moerloose P, Lepage R, Slosman D, Didier D, Unger PF, Patenaude JV, Bounameaux H. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet 1999; 353: 190-195 [Medline].
28. Kramer MS, Feinstein AR. Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981; 29: 111-123 [Medline].
29. Turkstra F, Karemaker R, van Beek EJR, Buller HR. Diagnostic findings in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In Turkstra F. Venous thromboembolism: further optimalization of diagnostic and therapeutic management. Academic thesis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam; 1998. p. 89-99.
30.
Gottschalk A,
Stein PD,
Henry JW.
Patient stratification by cardiopulmonary status in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
J Nucl Med
1996;
37:
570-572
31.
Stein PD,
Coleman RE,
Gottschalk A,
Saltzman HA,
Terrin ML,
Weg JG.
Diagnostic utility of ventilation/perfusion lung scans in acute pulmonary embolism is not diminished by pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease.
Chest
1991;
100:
604-606
32.
Lesser BA,
Leeper KV Jr,,
Stein PD,
Saltzman HA,
Chen J,
Thompson BT,
Hales CA,
Popovich J Jr,,
Greenspan RH,
Weg JG.
The diagnosis
of acute pulmonary embolism in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Chest
1992;
102:
17-22
33.
Lijmer JG, van den Hout W, de Monyé W, Sanson BJ, Prins MH, Huisman MV, Pattynama PMT, Buller HR. Cost-effectiveness of non-invasive diagnostic strategies in pulmonary embolism [abstract]. Thromb
Haemost 1999;81(Suppl):173.
| |
APPENDIX |
|---|
The results of this study are reported on behalf of the study group of the Advances in New Technologies Evaluating the Localization of Pulmonary Embolism (ANTELOPE) study, a Dutch prospective multicenter study of the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
The investigators participating in the study are J. D. Banga, M.D., University Medical Center, Utrecht; B. J. Sanson, M.D., J. G. Lijmer, M.D., and H. R. Büller, M.D., Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; W. de Monyé, M.D., M. V. Huisman, M.D., and P. M. T. Pattynama, M.D., Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; M. J. L. van Strijen, M.D., and G. J. Kieft, M.D., Leyenburgh Hospital, The Hague; M. R. Mac Gillavry, M.D., and D. P. M. Brandjes, M.D., Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam; O. S. Hoekstra, M.D., R. A. Manoliu, M.D., University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. MacIntyre and Y. C. Huang Acute Exacerbations and Respiratory Failure in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Proceedings of the ATS, May 1, 2008; 5(4): 530 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Luciani, S. Cavuto, L. Antiga, M. Miniati, S. Monti, M. Pistolesi, and G. Bertolini Bayes pulmonary embolism assisted diagnosis: a new expert system for clinical use Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2007; 24(3): 157 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. T Rutschmann, J. Cornuz, P.-A. Poletti, P.-O. Bridevaux, O. W Hugli, S. D Qanadli, and A. Perrier Should pulmonary embolism be suspected in exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Thorax, February 1, 2007; 62(2): 121 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Tillie-Leblond, C.-H. Marquette, T. Perez, A. Scherpereel, C. Zanetti, A.-B. Tonnel, and M. Remy-Jardin Pulmonary embolism in patients with unexplained exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prevalence and risk factors. Ann Intern Med, March 21, 2006; 144(6): 390 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Meral, A. Mirici, S. Aslan, M. Akgun, H. Kaynar, L. Saglam, and M. Gorguner Barometric Pressure and the Incidence of Pulmonary Embolism Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2190 - 2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Spuentrup, M. Katoh, A. J. Wiethoff, E. C. Parsons Jr., R. M. Botnar, A. H. Mahnken, R. W. Gunther, and A. Buecker Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pulmonary Emboli with a Fibrin-specific Contrast Agent Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2005; 172(4): 494 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ohno, T. Higashino, D. Takenaka, K. Sugimoto, T. Yoshikawa, H. Kawai, M. Fujii, H. Hatabu, and K. Sugimura MR Angiography with Sensitivity Encoding (SENSE) for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Comparison with MDCT and Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 91 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Costello and K. Hogg CT pulmonary angiogram compared with ventilation-perfusion scan for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with cardiorespiratory disease Emerg. Med. J., November 1, 2003; 20(6): 547 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism Thorax, June 1, 2003; 58(6): 470 - 483. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Hagen, I. J.C. Hartmann, O. S. Hoekstra, M. P.M. Stokkel, P. E. Postmus, and M. H. Prins Comparison of Observer Variability and Accuracy of Different Criteria for Lung Scan Interpretation J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 739 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Hagen, I. J.C. Hartmann, O. S. Hoekstra, M. P.M. Stokkel, G. J.J. Teule, and M. H. Prins How to Use a Gestalt Interpretation for Ventilation-Perfusion Lung Scintigraphy J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2002; 43(10): 1317 - 1323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S P G Padley Lung scintigraphy vs spiral CT in the assessment of pulmonary emboli Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2002; 75(889): 5 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. TOBIN Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Pollution, Pulmonary Vascular Disease, Transplantation, Pleural Disease, and Lung Cancer in AJRCCM 2000 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2001; 164(10): 1789 - 1804. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. GIRARD, M. DECOUSUS, S. LAPORTE, A. BUCHMULLER, P. HERVE, C. LAMER, F. PARENT, and B. TARDY Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis . Specificity of Symptoms and Perfusion Defects at Baseline and during Anticoagulant Therapy Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2001; 164(6): 1033 - 1037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. | Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. |