help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MURAKAMI, S.
Right arrow Articles by HERVÉ, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MURAKAMI, S.
Right arrow Articles by HERVÉ, P.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 156, Number 2, August 1997, 454-458

Effects of Various Timings and Concentrations of Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion

SHINYA MURAKAMI, EMILE A. BACHA, GUY M. MAZMANIAN, HÉLENE DÉTRUIT, ALAIN CHAPELIER, PHILIPPE DARTEVELLE, and PHILIPPE HERVÉ, for the Paris-Sud University Lung Transplantation Group

Laboratoire de Chirurgie Expérimentale and Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery and Heart-Lung Transplantation, Centre Chirurgical Marie-Lannelongue, Paris-Sud University, Le Plessis Robinson, France; Department of Surgery, Kanazawa University School of Medicine, Kanazawa, Japan; and General Surgical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Experimental studies reveal that inhaled nitric oxide (NO) can prevent, worsen, or have no effect on lung injury in the setting of ischemia-reperfusion (I-R). We tested the hypothesis that these disparate effects could be related to differences in the timing of administration and/or concentration of inhaled NO during I-R. Isolated rat lungs were subjected to 1-h periods of ischemia followed by 1-h periods of blood reperfusion. We investigated the effects of NO (30 ppm) given during ischemia, NO (30 or 80 ppm) begun immediately at reperfusion, or NO (30 ppm) given 15 min after the beginning of reperfusion, on total pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), the coefficient of filtration (Kfc), the lung wet/dry weight ratio (W/D) of lung tissue, and lung myeloperoxidase activity (MPO). A control group did not receive NO. NO given during ischemia had no effect on Kfc or MPO, but decreased PVR. NO (30 ppm) during reperfusion (early or delayed) decreased PVR, W/D, Kfc, and MPO. NO at 80 ppm decreased PVR and MPO but not W/D or Kfc. In conclusion, NO at 30 ppm, given immediately or in a delayed fashion during reperfusion, attenuates I-R-induced lung injury. NO at 30 ppm given during ischemia or at 80 ppm during reperfusion is not protective.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Lung ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) leads to increased microvascular permeability and sequestration of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) in the lung, dysfunction of the pulmonary endothelium, and pulmonary hypertension (1). Increasingly, ischemia and reperfusion are being recognized as two separate events that have a distinct pathophysiology, and each of which can independently cause damage (4). During ischemia, hypoxic stress initiates the conversion of xanthine dehydrogenase to xanthine oxidase, and promotes the catabolism of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to yield hypoxanthine. When oxygen is reintroduced at the time of reperfusion, it reacts with hypoxanthine and xanthine oxidase to produce a burst of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide (4). This is generally seen as the initial proinflammatory event that leads to early endothelial injury and the activation and adhesion of PMNs to endothelial cells in I-R injury (5). PMNs can then augment the lung injury by releasing reactive oxygen species and cytotoxic enzymes in close proximity to the endothelium (3). The sequestration of PMNs is a central feature in nearly all models of I-R injury.

Nitric oxide (NO) appears to be a key modulator in I-R injury. Endogenous NO levels plummet rapidly after reperfusion (6, 7), and exogenous NO has been reported to be protective in many models of I-R injury (8). Studies in our laboratory have shown that inhaled NO, given during reperfusion, attenuates I-R-induced lung injury, endothelial dysfunction, and PMN accumulation in isolated piglet lungs and in intact pigs following lung transplantation (8, 9). In addition, many studies have demonstrated beneficial effects of NO or NO donors in other models of pulmonary, cardiac, renal, or mesenteric I-R injury (10).

Several mechanisms might account for this beneficial effect: NO inhibits xanthine oxidase (15), quenches superoxide radicals, prevents neutrophil activation and adherence to the endothelium (16, 17) and platelet aggregation (18), mediates vasodilation, and maintains endothelial homeostasis (19). Nevertheless, the use of exogenous NO during I-R remains controversial, mainly because NO can combine with superoxide to form highly toxic peroxynitrite (20, 21), which could explain the deleterious effect of NO or incomplete protection with NO reported in some studies (22, 23). Such interaction has been reported in lungs (24), heart (25), and endothelial cells (21). Peroxynitrite catalyzes membrane peroxidation, reacts with metals to form toxic nitrosylating species, and oxidizes sulfhydryl groups on cellular proteins (20, 21). The timing of administration and dosage of NO remain issues of importance, because it has been suggested that delaying NO inhalation after the initial burst of radical oxygen species at early reperfusion (22, 12), or reducing the concentration of NO (8, 9), might abrogate the potentially deleterious effects of its use. Therefore, we designed the present study to investigate the effect of different concentrations and timings of administration of inhaled NO on lung function in experimental I-R lung injury. Using a model of I-R injury in an ex vivo, blood-perfused, isolated rat-lung preparation (26), we gave inhaled NO during different periods and at varying concentrations, following which we studied endothelial permeability, pulmonary vascular resistance, and PMN sequestration.

    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

All animals received humane care in compliance with the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources and published by the National Institutes of Health.

Isolated Perfused Rat Lung Preparation

Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats (250 to 300 g body weight; Iffa Credo, Paris, France) were anesthetized with thiopental sodium (50 mg/kg intraperitoneally), tracheostomized, and ventilated. After sternotomy and median pericardotomy, a polyethylene cannula was inserted into the pulmonary artery (PA) through the right ventricle. A second cannula was placed in the left atrium through a mid-left-ventricular incision. The heart-lung preparation was then dissected free and suspended in a Statham force-displacement transducer that was put into a thermostated and humidified chamber to monitor weight changes. The lungs were then ventilated with a Harvard rodent ventilator (Model 680; South Natick, MA) at 60 breaths/min, a VT of 2.5 ml, and a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 2 cm H2O. Ventilation was performed with a humidified, warmed gas mixture (20% O2/5% CO2/75% N2). Lungs were perfused via the PA cannula with 30 ml heparinized blood obtained from two donor rats. Blood was recirculated with a peristaltic pump (Ismatec; Bioblock, Paris, France) at a flow rate of 0.04 ml/g body weight/min. Pulmonary effluent blood was collected in a plastic reservoir through the cannula placed in the left atrium.

Hemodynamic Measurements

Pulmonary artery pressure (Ppa), pulmonary venous pressure (Ppv), and airway pressure were continuously monitored with P23 ID transducers (Statham, Paris, France) connected to an amplifier (Model M52; Telco, Paris, France). Pulmonary capillary pressure (Ppc) was measured with the double occlusion method (14, 26). A cannulating probe (Model 1517-025, Statham) connected to an electromagnetic flowmeter (Model 2201, Statham) was placed in series with the perfusing circuit for continuous pulmonary blood flow (Q) monitoring. Flow and pressure signals were recorded on a multichannel chart recorder (ED69; Alco, Paris, France). Zone 3 conditions (arterial > venous > alveolar pressures) were maintained throughout all experiments. Total pulmonary vascular resistance was calculated as: PVR = (Ppa - Ppv)/Q.

Determination of the coefficient of filtration. The coefficient of filtration (Kfc), used as an index of endothelial permeability to fluid, was measured with the isogravimetric method (14, 26). After an isogravimetric period of 30 min, Ppv was rapidly increased by 8 cm H2O for 15 min by raising the outflow end of the left atrial cannula. The increase in lung weight was recorded. A characteristic rapid weight gain due to vascular filling was followed by a slower rate of weight gain reflecting filtration of fluid into the pulmonary interstitium. The rate of slow weight change (dW/dt) was determined through linear regression of the log10-transformed weight changes per minute. The initial rate of weight gain was calculated by extrapolating dW/dt to Time 0. Kfc was calculated by dividing dW/dt at Time 0 by the change in Ppc that occurred after venous outflow pressure was increased, normalized for the baseline wet lung weight, and expressed as ml/min/cm H2O/100 g lung tissue. Baseline wet lung weight was estimated by measuring the weight of the heart, mediastinal tissue, and lungs at the beginning of the experiment and subtracting the weight of the extrapulmonary tissue at the end of the experiment.

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Activity

At the end of each experiment, lungs were flushed with normal saline at a low flow of 5 ml/min for 5 min. The right lung was then snap- frozen in liquid nitrogen for MPO determination according to the method described by Mullane and colleagues (27). Briefly, lung tissue was homogenized in 10% (wt/vol) hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide phosphate buffer, using a Polytron homogenizer (Kinematica, Lucerne, Switzerland). The homogenate was sonicated, frozen, thawed, and centrifuged. Supernatant was assayed spectrophotometrically for MPO activity.

Wet-dry Weight Ratio

Lungs excised at the end of the experiment were weighed for determination of the final wet lung weight. The left lung was weighed separately and stored in an oven at 60° C. The left lung was weighed daily until the dry weight was stable for longer than 5 d, to allow determination of the wet/dry (W/D) weight ratio.

Gas Preparation

NO was purchased from CFPO Inc. (Paris, France) as a mixture of 450 ppm in pure nitrogen. NO (30 or 80 ppm) was mixed with the inspired gas mixture and the resulting mixture was stored in a balloon. The concentrations of NO and NO2 were measured in the balloon with an electrochemical method (NOxbox; Bedfont Scientific Ltd., Upchurch, UK). NO2 concentrations remained under 2 ppm.

Specific Protocol

Five groups (n = 6 each) were studied. A control group, a group to which NO (30 ppm) was given only during ischemia (NO-30-I), a group in which NO at 30 ppm was started immediately at the beginning of reperfusion (NO-30-R), a group in which NO at 80 ppm was started immediately at the beginning of reperfusion (NO-80-R), and a group in which NO administration (30 ppm) was delayed and started only after 15 min of reperfusion (NO-30-DR). The cumulative doses of NO were approximately 11 nmol in the NO-30-I and NO-30-R groups, 9 nmol in the NO-30-DR group, and 29 nmol in the NO-80-R group. After being placed in the thermostated and humidified chamber, the lungs were allowed to equilibrate for 30 min and made isogravimetric by adjusting Ppv. Baseline values for Ppa, Ppv, and Ppc were then measured. Perfusion was then interrupted, and the lungs were maintained in the humidified chamber at a temperature of 37° C for 60 min (warm ischemia). Ventilation was continued throughout the ischemia period, with a humidified, warmed gas mixture of N2 with or without addition of NO (30 ppm). At the end of the ischemia period, after the arterial and venous cannulas were clamped, the recirculating blood was discarded and the external circuit was flushed with saline. New fresh blood was then obtained from two donor rats and the lungs were reventilated with 20% O2/5% CO2/75% N2 with or without NO and reperfused for a period of 60 min under isogravimetric conditions during which Ppa, Ppv, Ppc, and Kfc were measured. The hematocrit was adjusted to 28% at the beginning of each reperfusion period (baseline/reperfusion) by adding saline.

Statistical Analysis

All results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Baseline and final measurements of hemodynamic variables were compared through the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Mann-Whitney test to compare Kfc, lung MPO activity and W/D ratio values in the different groups. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Hemodynamic Variables

Baseline measurements of Ppa, Ppv, Ppc, and PVR were similar in all groups (Figure 1). After I-R, Ppc values did not differ in the five groups. After I-R, percent increases in PVR above the respective baseline values were higher (p < 0.05) in the control group than in the other groups (72 ± 22% in the control versus 34.7 ± 7% in the NO-30-I, 34.4 ± 7% in the NO-30-R, 35.1 ± 10% in the NO-30-DR, and 10.7 ± 3% in the NO-80-R groups). After I-R, PVR did not differ from baseline in the NO-80-R group, and was lower than in the four other groups, indicating that inhaled NO at 80 ppm prevented the reperfusion-induced increase in PVR.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.   Total pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in control rats and rats treated with inhaled NO at 30 ppm during the ischemia period (NO-30-I), 30 ppm or 80 ppm started immediately after reperfusion (NO-30-R or NO-80-R), or 30 ppm started 15 min later (NO-30-DR). Solid bars indicate baseline values for each condition. Results are expressed as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05 versus baseline, dagger p < 0.05 versus control group after ischemia-reperfusion, Dagger p < 0.05 versus NO-30-I, NO-30-R, and NO-30-DR groups after ischemia-reperfusion.

Pulmonary Edema and Endothelial Permeability

The W/D ratio and Kfc were significantly (p < 0.05) decreased in both groups treated with NO30 ppm during reperfusion (NO-30-R and NO-30-DR), as compared with the control, NO-30-I, and NO-80-R groups (Figures 2 and 3). The W/D ratio and Kfc in the NO-30-I and NO-80-R groups did not differ from those of the control group.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.   Coefficient of filtration (Kfc) after ischemia-reperfusion in control rats and rats treated with inhaled NO at 30 ppm during the ischemia period (NO-30-I), 30 ppm or 80 ppm started immediately after reperfusion (NO-30-R or NO-80-R), or 30 ppm started 15 min later (NO-30-DR). Results are expressed as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05 versus control, NO-30-I, and NO-80-R groups.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3.   Wet/dry lung weight ratio (W/D) after ischemia-reperfusion in control rats and rats treated with inhaled NO at 30 ppm during the ischemia period (NO-30-I), 30 ppm or 80 ppm started immediately after reperfusion (NO-30-R or NO-80-R), or 30 ppm started 15 min later (NO-30-DR). Results are expressed as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05 versus control, NO-30-I, and NO-80-R groups.

PMN Sequestration

MPO activity was significantly reduced only when inhaled NO (30 ppm) was given during reperfusion (NO-30-R and NO-30-DR), and not during ischemia (Figure 4). A higher dose of NO during reperfusion (80 ppm) resulted in a further decrease in MPO than did a dose of 30 ppm.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4.   Lung myeloperoxidase activity (MPO) after ischemia- reperfusion in control rats and rats treated with inhaled NO at 30 ppm during the ischemia period (NO-30-I), 30 ppm or 80 ppm started immediately after reperfusion (NO-30-R or NO-80-R), or 30 ppm started 15 min later (NO-30-DR). Results are expressed as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05 versus control and NO-30-I groups.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The results of the present study that inhaled NO at 30 ppm, given immediately or in a delayed fashion during reperfusion, prevented I-R-induced lung injury. A higher dose (80 ppm), of NO, started immediately at reperfusion, was not protective, although it further decreased pulmonary hypertension and PMN sequestration. Inhaled NO at 30 ppm administered during ischemia was not beneficial.

An increase in pulmonary microvascular permeability, which in our study was assessed on the basis of Kfc and W/D, is the main consequence of lung endothelial I-R injury. Kfc values after I-R in the control group of animals in our study were very close to values measured in our previous study (26) (i.e., a 100% increase as compared with values measured under baseline conditions). Since the PMN-endothelium interaction is the central mechanism in I-R-induced lung endothelial injury (3, 26), the lung sequestration of PMNs was assessed in the present study by measuring the lung MPO content (27).

Inhaled NO has been proposed to prevent I-R injury by maintaining endothelial cell function and decreasing PMN adhesion to endothelial cells. However, concerns have emerged about potential toxic side effects of NO, stemming from the production of highly toxic peroxynitrite and hydroxyl anion when exogenous NO encounters superoxide generated during reperfusion (20, 21). Yet predictions about therapeutic or toxic effects of inhaled NO in lung I-R are limited by incomplete knowledge of its optimal concentrations and timing of administration.

Timing of NO Administration: Ischemia Versus Reperfusion

In the setting of lung ischemia, inhaled NO is theoretically attractive because it can be delivered in the pulmonary endothelial cells even after cessation of cardiac activity. In support of buttressing the NO pathway during ischemia, a recent study (23) compared a cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) analogue given during ischemia with inhaled NO (65 ppm) administered during reperfusion after rat-lung transplantation. The authors concluded that the former treatment was more beneficial because it bypassed the reactive oxygen species-producing step. Previous studies also indicated that administration prior to injury of the NO-precursor L-arginine (38), NO-donors (10), or inhaled NO (29) reduced lung damage after I-R. Another study, in renal I-R, demonstrated that NO was most beneficial when given during early ischemia (12). Conversely, a recent report indicated that NO is more beneficial during reperfusion than during ischemia in rat small-bowel transplantation (30). The present study confirms these latter findings: inhaled NO at 30 ppm during ischemia was not protective, whereas the same dose given during reperfusion was. The protection (reduced W/D, and Kfc) occurs through inhibition of PMN accumulation, rather than through a vasoactive effect, since NO only partially prevented pulmonary hypertension. Moreover, NO at 30 ppm during ischemia similarly reduced PVR, but had no protective effect on PMN sequestration in or I-R injury to the lung. This observation is consistent with earlier reports indicating that NO limits PMN-induced lung injury via mechanisms unrelated to direct vasodilatation (11, 12, 31). Additionally, our findings confirm several reports that L-arginine or inhaled NO was beneficial when used during reperfusion in experimental models of lung I-R (7, 22).

Delayed versus Immediate Administration of NO During Reperfusion, and NO at 80 ppm versus 30 ppm

In a recent study (22), early administration of inhaled NO at 80 ppm during reperfusion worsened postischemic reperfusion lung injury. Delaying NO inhalation until 10 min after reperfusion, or blockade with superoxide dismutase, avoided the toxicity, which was thus thought to occur from a harmful interaction between NO and superoxide during early reperfusion. Another study showed that early administration of inhaled NO at 65 ppm during reperfusion had no protective effect in experimental lung transplantation (23). Our present results, as well as those in our previous study (8), indicate that starting inhaled NO at lower concentrations (30 or 10 ppm) immediately at reperfusion or after 15 min does not result in toxic effects; rather, similar protective effects were observed with both approaches. A possible explanation for this apparent discrepancy is the concentration of inhaled NO. In our study, higher-dose (80 ppm) inhaled NO started immediately at reperfusion resulted in a further inhibition of I-R-induced pulmonary hypertension and PMN sequestration, whereas no concomitant protection against microvascular permeability was observed. These results suggest that administration of NO at 80 ppm as compared with 30 ppm was associated with increased production of toxic peroxynitrates, which abrogated the beneficial effects of the further inhibition of PMN accumulation in the lung. All of these observations illustrate the delicate balance between the beneficial and toxic effects of inhaled NO as a function of the concentrations used.

The present study has some limitations in relation to the species of animal and the isolated lung preparation used. However, the clinical implications of our findings may be important. Inhaled NO given at a concentration of 30 ppm or lower during reperfusion, as recently recommended for therapeutic use (32, 33), can be of benefit in the prevention of I-R-induced lung injury. Conversely, higher concentrations of 60 to 80 ppm, which may be needed in some patients with severe pulmonary hypertension (33), should not be offered in the setting of lung I-R because they may either not prevent or even worsen lung injury.

In conclusion, our study demonstrated that inhaled NO, given at 30 ppm during early reperfusion or in a delayed manner, results in prevention of I-R-induced microvascular injury in an isolated, blood-perfused rat-lung model. The mechanisms for this are likely to involve PMN inhibition rather than vasodilation. Inhaled NO at 30 ppm during ischemia was ineffective. Higher-dose (80 ppm) inhaled NO during reperfusion prevents I-R-induced PMN accumulation and vasoconstriction, but is not protective against the I-R induced increase in endothelial permeability.

    Footnotes

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Philippe Hervé, M.D., Centre Chirurgical Marie-Lannelongue, 133 Avenue de la Résistance, 92350 Le Plessis Robinson, France.

(Received in original form August 6, 1996 and in revised form March 10, 1997).

Acknowledgments: Supported by grants from the Association Francaise de Lutte contre la Mucoviscidose (AFLM) and the Etablissement Français des Greffes (EFG).
    References
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Bishop, M. J., E. S. Boatman, T. D. Ivey, J. P. Jordan, and F. W. Cheney. 1986. Reperfusion of ischemic dog lungs results in fever, leukopenia and lung edema. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis 134: 752-756 [Medline].

2. Adkins, W. K., and A. E. Taylor. 1990. Role of xanthine oxidase and neutrophils in ischemia-reperfusion injury in rabbit lungs. J. Appl. Physiol 69: 2012-2018 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

3. Seibert, A. F., J. Haynes, and A. E. Taylor. 1993. Ischemia-reperfusion injury in the isolated rat lung. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis 147: 270-275 [Medline].

4. Grisham, M. B., and D. N. Granger. 1989. Metabolic sources of reactive oxygen metabolites during oxidant stress and ischemia with reperfusion. Clin. Chest Med 10: 71-81 [Medline].

5. Lewis, M. S., R. E. Whatley, P. Cain, T. M. McIntyre, S. M. Prescott, and G. A. Zimmerman. 1988. Hydrogen peroxide stimulates the synthesis of platelet-activating factor by endothelium and induces endothelial cell-dependent neutrophil adhesion. J. Clin. Invest 82: 2045-2055 .

6. Davenpeck, K. L., J. Guo, and A. Leffer. 1993. Pulmonary artery endothelial dysfunction following ischemia and reperfusion of the rabbit lung. J. Vasc. Res 30: 145-153 [Medline].

7. Normandin, L., P. Hervé, C. Brink, A. Chapelier, P. Dartevelle, and G. M. Mazmanian. 1995. L-Arginine and pentoxifylline attenuate endothelial dysfunction after lung reperfusion in the rabbit. Ann. Thorac. Surg 60: 646-650 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

8. Barbotin-Larrieu, F., G. M. Mazmanian, B. Baudet, H. Detruit, A. Chapelier, P. Dartevelle, and P. Hervé. 1996. Prevention of ischemia reperfusion lung injury by inhaled nitric oxide in neonatal piglets. J. Appl. Physiol 80: 782-788 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

9. Bacha, E. A., P. Hervé, S. Murakami, A. Chapelier, G. M. Mazmanian, V. Montpreville, H. Detruit, J. M. Libert, and P. Dartevelle. 1996. Lasting beneficial effect of short term inhaled nitric oxide on graft function after lung transplantation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg 112: 590-598 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

10. Naka, Y., N. C. Chowdhury, H. Liao, D. K. Roy, M. C. Oz, R. E. Michler, and D. J. Pinsky. 1995. Enhanced preservation of orthotopically transplanted rat lungs by nitroglycerin but not hydralazine: requirement for graft vascular homeostasis beyond harvest vasodilation. Circ. Res 76: 900-906 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

11. Lefer, D. J., K. Nakanishi, W. E. Johnston, and J. Vinten-Johansen. 1993. Antineutrophil and myocardial protecting actions of the novel nitric oxide donor after acute myocardial ischemia and reperfusion in dogs. Circulation 88: 2337-2350 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

12. Lopez-Neblina, F., L. H. Toledo-Pereyra, R. Mirmiran, and A. J. Paez-Rollys. 1996. Time dependence of Na-nitroprusside administration in the prevention of neutrophil infiltration in the rat ischemic kidney. Transplantation 61: 179-183 [Medline].

13. Kurose, I., R. Wolf, M. B. Grisham, and D. N. Granger. 1994. Modulation of ischemia-reperfusion-induced microvascular dysfunction by nitric oxide. Circ. Res 74: 376-382 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

14. Moore, T. M., P. L. Khimenko, P. S. Wilson, and A. E. Taylor. 1996. Role of nitric oxide in lung ischemia and reperfusion injury. Am. J. Physiol 271: H1970-H1977 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

15. Hassoun, P. M., F. S. Yu, J. J. Zulueta, A. C. White, and J. J. Lanzillo. 1995. Effect of nitric oxide and cell redox status on the regulation of endothelial cell xanthine dehydrogenase. Am. J. Physiol 268: L809-L817 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

16. Chollet-Martin, S., C. Gatecel, N. Kermarrec, M. A. Gougerot-Pocidalo, and D. Payen. 1996. Alveolar neutrophil functions and cytokine levels in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome during nitric oxide inhalation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med 153: 985-990 [Abstract].

17. Kubes, P., M. Suzuki, and D. N. Granger. 1994. Nitric oxide: an endogenous modulator of leukocyte adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 88: 4651-4655 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

18. Samama, C. M., M. Diaby, J. L. Fellahi, A. Mdhafar, D. Eyraud, M. Arock, J. J. Guillosson, P. Coriat, and J. J. Rouby. 1995. Inhibition of platelet aggregation by inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology 83: 56-65 [Medline].

19. Cooke, J. P., and P. S. Tao. 1993. Cytoprotective effects of nitric oxide. Circulation 88: 2451-2454 [Free Full Text].

20. Hogg, N., V. M. Darley-Usmar, M. T. Wilson, and S. Moncada. 1992. Production of hydroxyl radicals from the simultaneous generation of superoxide and nitric oxide. Biochem. J 281: 419-424 .

21. Beckman, J. S., T. W. Beckman, J. Chen, P. A. Marshall, and B. A. Freeman. 1994. Apparent hydroxyl radical production by peroxynitrite: implications for endothelial injury from nitric oxide and superoxide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 87: 1620-1624 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

22. Eppinger, M. J., P. A. Ward, M. L. Jones, S. F. Bolling, and G. M. Deeb. 1995. Disparate effects of nitric oxide on lung ischemia-reperfusion injury. Ann. Thorac. Surg 60: 1169-1176 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

23. Naka, Y., D. K. Roy, A. J. Smerling, R. E. Michler, C. R. Smith, D. M. Stern, M. C. Oz, and D. J. Pinsky. 1995. Inhaled NO fails to confer the pulmonary protection provided by distal stimulation of the nitric oxide pathway at the level of cyclic guanosine monophosphate. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg 110: 1434-1441 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

24. Ischiropoulos, H., A. B. Al-Mehdi, and A. B. Fisher. 1995. Reactive species in ischemic rat lung injury: contribution of peroxynitrite. Am. J. Physiol 169: L158-L164 .

25. Matheis, G., M. P. Sherman, G. D. Buckberg, D. P. Haybron, H. H. Young, and L. J. Ignarro. 1992. Role of L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway in myocardial reoxygenation injury. Am. J. Physiol 262: H616-H620 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

26. Reignier, J., M. Mazmanian, H. Detruit, A. Chapelier, M. Weiss, J. M. Libert, and P. Hervé. 1994. Reduction of ischemia-reperfusion injury by pentoxyifylline in the isolated rat lung. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med 150: 342-347 [Abstract].

27. Mullane, K. M., R. Kraemer, and B. Smith. 1985. Myeloperoxidase activity as a quantitative assessment of neutrophil infiltration in ischemic myocardium. J. Pharmacol. Methods 14: 157-167 [Medline].

28. Xiong, L., M. Mazmanian, A. R. Chapelier, J. Reignier, M. Weiss, P. G. Dartevele, and P. Hervé. 1994. Lung preservation with Eurocollins, University of Wisconsin, Wallwork, and low-potassium-dextran solutions. Ann. Thorac. Surg 58: 845-850 [Abstract].

29. Kavanah, B. P., A. Mouchawar, J. Goldsmith, and R. G. Pearl. 1994. Effects of inhaled NO and inhibition of endogenous NO synthesis in oxidant-induced acute lung injury. J. Appl. Physiol 76: 1324-1329 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

30. Mueller, A. R., K. P. Platz, J. M. Langrehr, R. A. Hoffman, A. K. Nussler, M. Nalesnik, T. R. Billiard, and W. H. Schraut. 1994. The effects of administration of nitric oxide inhibitors during small bowel preservation and reperfusion. Transplantation 58: 1309-1316 [Medline].

31. Guidot, D. M., M. J. Repine, B. M. Hybertson, and J. E. Repine. 1995. Inhaled nitric oxide prevents neutrophil-mediated, oxygen radical- dependent leak in isolated rat lungs. Am. J. Physiol 269: L2-L5 [Abstract/Free Full Text].

32. Zapol, M. W., S. Rimar, N. Gillis, M. Marletta, and C. H. Bosken. 1994. Nitric oxide and the lung. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med 149: 1375-1380 [Medline].

33. Fink, M. P., and D. Payen. 1995. The role of nitric oxide in sepsis and ARDS: synopsis of a roundtable held in Brussels, March 18-20, 1995.  Intens. Care Med 22: 158-165 [Medline].





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. Chen, T. Nakamura, T. Fujinaga, J. Zhang, H. Hamakawa, M. Omasa, H. Sakai, N. Hanaoka, T. Bando, H. Wada, et al.
Protective Effect of a Nebulized {beta}2-Adrenoreceptor Agonist in Warm Ischemic-Reperfused Rat Lungs
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 82(2): 465 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. Perrin, A. Roch, P. Michelet, M. Reynaud-Gaubert, P. Thomas, C. Doddoli, and J.-P. Auffray
Inhaled nitric oxide does not prevent pulmonary edema after lung transplantation measured by lung water content: a randomized clinical study.
Chest, April 1, 2006; 129(4): 1024 - 1030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. R. Glanville
Inhaled Nitric Oxide after Lung Transplantation: No More Cosmesis?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2003; 167(11): 1463 - 1464.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. O. Meade, J. T. Granton, A. Matte-Martyn, K. McRae, B. Weaver, P. Cripps, and S. H. Keshavjee
A Randomized Trial of Inhaled Nitric Oxide to Prevent Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury after Lung Transplantation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2003; 167(11): 1483 - 1489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. de Perrot, M. Liu, T. K. Waddell, and S. Keshavjee
Ischemia-Reperfusion-induced Lung Injury
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2003; 167(4): 490 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
J Cranshaw, M J D Griffiths, and T W Evans
The pulmonary physician in critical care c 9: Non-ventilatory strategies in ARDS
Thorax, September 1, 2002; 57(9): 823 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. L. Kang, W. Park, I. S. Pack, H. S. Lee, M. J. Kim, C.-M. Lim, and Y. Koh
Inhaled nitric oxide attenuates acute lung injury via inhibition of nuclear factor-kappa B and inflammation
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2002; 92(2): 795 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
M. R. Karamsetty and J. R. Klinger
NO: More Than Just a Vasodilator in Lung Transplantation
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., January 1, 2002; 26(1): 1 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
H. SCHUTTE, K. MAYER, H. BURGER, M. WITZENRATH, T. GESSLER, W. SEEGER, and F. GRIMMINGER
Endogenous Nitric Oxide Synthesis and Vascular Leakage in Ischemic-Reperfused Rabbit Lungs
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2001; 164(3): 412 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. R. Thom, D. Fisher, and Y. Manevich
Roles for platelet-activating factor and {middle dot}NO-derived oxidants causing neutrophil adherence after CO poisoning
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): H923 - H930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. M. Fiser, J. T. Cope, I. L. Kron, A. K. Kaza, S. M. Long, J. A. Kern, and C. G. Tribble
Aerosolized prostacyclin (epoprostenol) as an alternative to inhaled nitric oxide for patients with reperfusion injury after lung transplantation
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2001; 121(5): 981 - 982.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
H. Schutte, M. Witzenrath, K. Mayer, N. Weissmann, A. Schell, S. Rosseau, W. Seeger, and F. Grimminger
The PDE inhibitor zaprinast enhances NO-mediated protection against vascular leakage in reperfused lungs
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, September 1, 2000; 279(3): L496 - L502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
D. M. Payen
Is Nitric Oxide Inhalation a ""Cosmetic"" Therapy in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 1998; 157(5): 1361 - 1362.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MURAKAMI, S.
Right arrow Articles by HERVÉ, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MURAKAMI, S.
Right arrow Articles by HERVÉ, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1997 American Thoracic Society