help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RENÉE CROWTHER LABIRIS, N.
Right arrow Articles by NEWHOUSE, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by RENÉE CROWTHER LABIRIS, N.
Right arrow Articles by NEWHOUSE, M. T.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 160, Number 5, November 1999, 1711-1716

Dry Powder versus Intravenous and Nebulized Gentamicin in Cystic Fibrosis and Bronchiectasis
A Pilot Study

N. RENÉE CROWTHER LABIRIS, ANNE M. HOLBROOK, HENRY CHRYSTYN, STUART M. MACLEOD, and MICHAEL T. NEWHOUSE*

Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, Father Sean O'Sullivan Research Centre and Barnett Medical Aerosol Research Laboratory, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and School of Pharmacy, University of Bradford, United Kingdom

Aminoglycosides are a mainstay of therapy for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) or non-CF bronchiectasis who are infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Psa). Traditionally, aerosolized antibiotics are delivered by liquid nebulization. The objective of this study was to determine whether a gentamicin dry powder inhaler (DPI) is as microbiologically active and potentially safe as gentamicin inhaled via a small-volume nebulizer (SVN) or given intravenously. The study was done according to a randomized, single-dose, and triple crossover protocol. Ten patients with CF or non-CF bronchiectasis and chronically infected with Psa were recruited. Patients received a single dose of either gentamicin 160 mg via DPI or SVN, or gentamicin at 5 mg/kg by intravenous infusion. In seven of the 10 patients, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was achieved in sputum after DPI and SVN, with mean (95% confidence interval) gentamicin concentrations at 2 h after administration of 13.1 µg/g sputum (range: 2.2 to 23.9 µg/g) and 97.2 µg/g sputum (range: 0.3 to 194.2 µg/g), respectively, whereas gentamicin levels in the sputum after intravenous administration failed to reach the MIC. Gentamicin given by DPI and SVN significantly decreased the sputum Psa density (p < 0.05), by almost one order of magnitude. No significant decline in bacterial counts was observed after intravenous gentamicin. When gentamicin was inhaled, blood concentrations were minimal, and were below concentrations known to cause systemic toxicity. For treatment of Psa infections susceptible to gentamicin, gentamicin administration by DPI appeared to be as efficient as by SVN, despite the delivery of a 7-fold lower dose to the airways. Crowther Labiris NR, Holbrook AM, Chrystyn H, Macleod SM, Newhouse MT. Dry powder versus intravenous and nebulized gentamicin in cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis: a pilot study.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
P. Scheinberg, E. Shore, and on behalf of the PC-TNDS-008 Study Group
A Pilot Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Tobramycin Solution for Inhalation in Patients With Severe Bronchiectasis
Chest, April 1, 2005; 127(4): 1420 - 1426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. T. Newhouse, P. H. Hirst, S. P. Duddu, Y. H. Walter, T. E. Tarara, A. R. Clark, and J. G. Weers
Inhalation of a Dry Powder Tobramycin PulmoSphere Formulation in Healthy Volunteers
Chest, July 1, 2003; 124(1): 360 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1999 American Thoracic Society
  ATS State of the Art 2009